All posts by Giulio

Vincent Callebaut Architectures: THE FLAVOURS ORCHARD


CONSTRUCTION OF 45 PLUS-ENERGY (BEPOS) VILLAS IN A SMART GRID
KUNMING 2014, YUNNAN PROVINCE, SOUTHWEST CHINA

1. CHINA’S ECO-HIGH-TECH CITIES : TOWARDS AN ENERGY EFFICIENT COMMUNITY IN KUNMING

Stepping out of your plus-energy house regulating the light and the temperature cleverly and automatically according to the sun’s path. Catch the vital energies of the nature by training ourselves Tai Chi Chuan or Qi Gong under a snow of cherry tree petals. Cultivate together with our neighbors the community vegetable garden. Harvest the organic vegetables for the family dinner. Wander between the marshes of rainwater harvesting and the recycling lagoons where the sky of koï carps is covered of lotus flowers. Swim in a naturally filtered swimming-pool. Admire the elegant and nagging axial wind turbines.

Listen the laughter of children of the eco-district who share with their grandparents the games of Mahjong, Go and Cuju in the wild field. Recycle our organic waste in compost wells producing natural fertilizer. Sort out the other waste via a silent and underground pneumatic collection system. Go to work by electric bicycle or driverless car (Electric Networked-Vehicle), both recharged directly by the photovoltaic roof of the house. Follow the road whose sensory LED lights match according to sounds and movements of the city-dwellers.

This is the Eco-High-Tech atmosphere of the “Flavours Orchard” project. It’s a pioneer project that fights for the conception of eco-responsible lifestyles along the Daguan river connecting the “Emerald”, the green lake of the city centre of Kunning, to the magnificent Dianchi Lake in the South. Capital of the Yunnan province, the city is located at 1894 meters high and benefits from a temperate climate all the year that gives to it the charming name of « The City of Eternal Spring ».

The site of several hectares is an old industrial wasteland devoted to be restored in a new eco-district whose exemplarity in terms of sustainable innovations is supposed to be reproducible everywhere in China. The leitmotiv is to produce more energy and biodiversity than we consume by recycling at the same time our waste in reusable natural resources endlessly towards a post-nuclear, post-fossil and zero carbon emission city. Through the creation of such projects, China is recovering its delay on the ecological debt reimbursement and tries to slow down the massive rural exodus it suffers by the creation of new urban prototypes mixing all the advantages of the city and the countryside.

 

2. 45 PLUS-ENERGY (BEPOS) VILLAS PLANTED IN THE SMART GRID OF A COMMUNITY ORCHARD

The building sector is a primary energy consumer particularly in China (40% of total consumed energy) in front of the transports (30%) and the industry (30%). It is responsible for more than 40% of total emissions of CO2. It’s obvious that the energy savings are thus the major economic and ecological challenge for this sector. Whereas the prices of the fuel and the non-renewable energy increase unavoidably, the objective is to divide by 10 the consumption of this construction sector for an equivalent service within the next ten years.

In this perspective, the concept of this new « Flavours Orchard » eco-district is to build 45 Plus-Energy Villas in a huge community orchard/food garden integrating a Smart Grid self-managed by the gardener-inhabitants and the participants of the project.

In the heart of this nourishing landscape, the goal is to associate a state-of-the-art for smart building automation systems and information integrated in each villa (leading to cost reduction and Increased functionality) with an intelligent energy network in order to redistribute the produced excess (electric, calorific, food) towards the nearest needs so as to prevent from the loss in lines or related to the storage systems. In addition to the fuel cells, the electric vehicles are also used as buffer storage of electricity excess produced by the solar roofs assuring thus the daily travels of the inhabitants for free.

The objective is also to repatriate the production of the organic agriculture in the heart of the city, center of its consumption. This bio-geographical integration of the master plan respects the natural qualities of the site and maintains the continuity of the endemic ecosystems (trees, hedges, streams, floras and fauna are preserved). Flavours Orchard is a genuine garden sharing its energies designed and cultivated collectively. Ideas are here more shared than the ground, the sun or the wind because it deals not only with producing what to eat, lighten and air conditions but also to meet on a common ground of ecological experimentations and collective projects. It’s an urban landscape open to everybody without fence between the villas, in favor of the neighborhood relationships and the intercultural and intergenerational social links. It’s an educational tool about the environment respect thanks to its ecological master plan, its organic agriculture technics, its smart home automation strategies and its integration of renewable energies.

The private garages for electric cars and the technical rooms for home automation are located underground. This basement distributes each villa under the central path to liberate completely the orchard dedicated only to pedestrians, cyclists or electric driverless cars.

The future families of these Plus-Energy villas will be able to live and work comfortably in their villa reinventing new eco-responsible lifestyles maximizing the normal living standards.

The 45 Plus-Energy Villas produce more energy from renewable energy sources, over the course of a year, than they consume from external sources. This is achieved by using large North and South facing window areas to allow sunlight to penetrate the structure, by reducing the need for energy use from air cooling units and light bulbs with triple-glazed windows, and by the addition of heavy insulation that means the structure is already warm in the evening and therefore needs less heating.

These passive buildings (BEPAS) that capture heat during the day in order to reduce the need to generate heat over night, exceed their energy needs through renewable energy production by the integration of solar photovoltaic and solar thermal panels, geothermal heat exchangers, and combined heat and power units (CHP). All grey water is recycled in lagoons for agricultural irrigation and toilet flushing. All waste water will be sent to bio-reactor facades (with panels filled with algae) for anaerobic digestion and the methane emitted during the digestion process will be used to produce energy and to cool the interiors.

The construction of positive energy constitutes a high technological and conceptual rupture. These villas are thermally insulated without discontinuity and without thermal bridges. They are airtight, present controlled ventilation and are also equipped with economical domestic appliances of A+++ class. They generalize the LED lighting with automatic detection of presence and needs. They have a total consumption of primary energy (heating, sanitary hot water, lighting, all appliances) estimated at less than 50 kWh/m2/year for an average production that can reach 100 kWh/m2/year via the sun or wind. According to the usage of inhabitants, the consumption of primary energy could even decrease under 35 kWh/m2/year.

The 45 villas building with a wood/steel structure are divided into three architectural typologies forming thus 3 eco-districts having their own identity:

2.1. THE “MOBIÜS” VILLA (15 units)

The Mobius Villa is organized around an endless ribbon drawing the symbol of infinity around two patios, one aquatic and the other planted. This ribbon with primary steel structure and secondary wood frame is built from the repetition of one trapezoidal module repeated 24 times in the space. This module, opened at 30 degrees forms thus a pedestrian sloping path of 720 degrees along its double revolution. It contains all the bedrooms, the bathrooms, the offices, the libraries and the game rooms. It is covered by a green roof, true suspended vegetable garden with high thermal inertia and with a zenithal photovoltaic glass roof. The curved geometry forms a snake in sustentation on top of a façade in “8” with supporting frames. Louvered shutters in translucent glass pivot automatically along this glass facade to regulate the solar inputs during the day.

The panoramic ground floor aims at immersing the diurnal life spaces in the heart of a clearing coiled in the orchard. The living room, the kitchens and reception rooms are located around the central vertical axis of the project. Actually at the intersection of the double loop, the vertical circulations distribute the 4 inhabited levels and the garden roof.

2.2. THE “MOUNTAIN” VILLA (15 units)

The Mountain Villa opens out at 180 degrees such as a huge Chinese fan built from east to west to ideally follow the sun’s path. It’s a double-skin architecture presenting a south facade very glazed and a very opaque north façade in wood presenting 20% of perforation. The 22 arches are linked together by cables. They are closed by solarized photovoltaic glass panels. Panels filled with algae are also integrated to the conception in the 7 central arches to produce bio-hydrogen. The second exterior skin develops a glued laminated timber frame and works as a huge windscreen shaped in wood lace. This trellis enables to assure the intimacy of the inhabitants and to regulate the inputs of heat by subduing the solar rays from east to west.

In the center of the villa, an atrium full of light raises on 4 levels. A spiral staircase coils around a panoramic glazed elevator to distribute all the night and relaxation spaces. The living rooms and reception spaces are opened towards the landscape by a big arch going through the North and South facades.

2.3. THE “SHELL” VILLA (15 units)

The Shell Villa liberates itself from the ground on its 6 stainless steel pillars to stretch towards the sky and to make its axial wind turbine higher than the top of the fruit trees. A circular deck takes the loads of a glued laminated timber carpentry that is plaited in diamonds such as a conical Chinese hat. It’s a cocoon villa drawn in double curves and organized around three patios in spiral that fit closely the membranes of the twisted wood beams.

These patios are isolated by the glass façades whereas three stainless steel petals put on insulating cushions coat the structure from outside. This radiant wood structure is divided into 36 standardized beams that are spaced out from each other by 10 degrees from their center. Thus, from the life spaces we obtain panoramic views on the whole orchard whereas an elevator goes through all the levels to the top of the mast of the axial wind turbine.

These three typologies of Plus-Energy Villas set up in the clearings of the great community orchard are the symbol that it is possible to invent new contemporary models of eco-responsible housing mixing the economical evolution in China and the worldwide respect of the environment. The precursory inhabitants are linked together by their citizen commitment for a new ecological ideal that is energetically efficient, collective and sustainable.

Through Architecture, the social life between city and countryside is first of all reinvented!

© Vincent Callebaut Architect

A ‘Garden Bridge’ across the Thames

Garden Bridge is a planned stunning new public garden and pedestrian crossing over the River Thames in London, England. Designed by London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic cauldron designer, Thomas Heatherwick and inspired by actress and campaigner, Joanna Lumley, star of Ab Fab and The Wolf of Wall Street, the Bridge will provide a vital new route between north and south London and feature plants, trees, woodland and meandering walkways to be used and enjoyed by all.

As one of the greenest cities of its size in the world, this precious new piece of landscape will add to London’s rich and diverse horticultural heritage of heathlands, parks, squares, allotments and community gardens and support many indigenous river edge plant species.

With a structure that widens and narrows across its span, the elevated garden will not only be a safe and easy way for London’s many commuters and visitors to cross the river, it will also make places along its length for pedestrians to stop and better enjoy the remarkable river setting and unparalleled views of the city. The addition of careful planting with variety in scale, openness and intimacy will create a new kind of public space in the city.

Heatherwick Studio is currently working closely with Transport for London and world-renowned engineering consultant Arup to develop the scheme. Arup is the lead consultant on the project, covering all the key engineering aspects of the Garden Bridge, as well as environmental consultancy, transport planning, landscape design support and project management services

Led by The Garden Bridge Trust, its groundbreaking design will integrate a new kind of public space into the fabric of the city, adding to London’s rich and diverse horticultural heritage.

The bridge will cost about £150million to design and build, which is being raised by donations. Following the public consultation ground will break in 2015. Completion of construction is foreseen for late 2017 and the opening for Summer 2018.

What will The Garden Bridge achieve?

The Garden Bridge will provide social, economic and environmental benefits on several fronts, some directly financial and others cultural and non-market. Briefly summarized, these are as follows:-

(1) Improved pedestrian connectivity and amenity: Many of the existing bridges that span the River Thames prioritise vehicles, the Garden Bridge is designed for pedestrians. The Garden Bridge will provide a new public pedestrian route away from cars and vehicles between Temple, the Strand and South Bank. This will encourage a modal shift to walking which contributes to congestion relief, improvements in health and environmental quality. There will also be a reduction in journey times for some journeys.

(2) Benefits of new urban garden: the provision of a new and unique central London open space has an intrinsic utility and amenity value. Providing a new green and open space for all to enjoy will further enhance the standard of living and cement London’s reputation as one of the leafiest capital cities in the world. The Garden Bridge will add to London’s rich and diverse horticultural heritage of heathlands, parks, squares and community gardens.

(3) Wider development effects: the Bridge will stimulate and support development on both the north and south banks, helping to attract new investment and supporting the transition towards higher value uses. By breathing life into and raising the profile of the north bank area (already the subject of a Business Improvement District) and increasing footfall to an estimate of up to 7m users a year, the Bridge will support development of this area to be realised.

(4) Increased visitor numbers creating economic growth in London and the UK: the Bridge will be a world class asset, with all of the potential of the Highline in New York, to feature in global marketing of the UK as a visitor destination – as well as enhancing the perception amongst international investors. This further increase in activity and footfall will lead to the development of complementary activities and uses that will generate jobs in the local economy on both sides of the river. The impact of increased tourism numbers (specifically attributable to better connected attractions) and tourism spend will be felt both in the local area and in the wider UK as London acts as a gateway.

(5) Supporting the UK’s creative sector: the Bridge will enhance the connections between two cultural and creative clusters of international renown: Covent Garden/Aldwych (including the Royal Opera House, West Central theatres, Somerset House, King’s College etc) and the South Bank (including the Royal Festival Hall and South Bank Centre, National Theatre, National Film Theatre and Rambert Dance etc).

(6) Showcasing UK expertise and innovation in engineering, design and landscape: the visionary concept of the Bridge and its very high quality design, led by three UK firms, will create a unique and iconic structure that will become recognised worldwide, showcasing expertise in design, engineering and landscape, and supporting the UK and London’s international profile as a centre for the creative industries and its claims as thought leading capital of the world.

(5) Supporting the UK’s creative sector: the Bridge will enhance the connections between two cultural and creative clusters of international renown: Covent Garden/Aldwych (including the Royal Opera House, West Central theatres, Somerset House, King’s College etc) and the South Bank (including the Royal Festival Hall and South Bank Centre, National Theatre, National Film Theatre and Rambert Dance etc).

(6) Showcasing UK expertise and innovation in engineering, design and landscape: the visionary concept of the Bridge and its very high quality design, led by three UK firms, will create a unique and iconic structure that will become recognised worldwide, showcasing expertise in design, engineering and landscape, and supporting the UK and London’s international profile as a centre for the creative industries and its claims as thought leading capital of the world.

816_ 02_HR_GardenBridge_CREDIT_Arup

Web: www.heatherwick.com

LEED VS. GREEN GLOBES

LEED and  Green Globes – a Comparison

By Jiri Skopek  AA DIP.,OAA, MCIP, RIBA

With the sudden re-emergence of Green Globes as a recognized green building rating system, practitioners may be wondering which system to use.

Just as all homo sapiens originated in Africa, all the green building rating system have their origin in BREEAM, hence it is not surprising that most rating systems focus on the same basic issues: site characteristics, energy and water consumption, the use of resources/materials, and the indoor environmental quality (IEQ).

Both systems are recognized and accepted in Canada by the Federal Sustainability Strategy and several Provincial Green building Policies, and in the USA by General Services Administration (GSA) and other agencies of the Federal government, as well as many state and local jurisdictions.   Compared to LEED, there is little doubt that the Green Globes brand has been poorly marketed. LEED, on the other hand, has been powered by US marketing savvy and has become the dominant, recognized label. As such it has been an influential advocate for sustainability in the built environment and inspired a green vision for the industry.

In Canada, LEED continues to have a great success in reaching new construction market, whereas Green Globes has been more prominent in the existing building market under the BOMA BESt brand.

Both rating systems have been recently updated. The newest version of LEED (v4) was rolled out at Greenbuild 2013 and features increased thresholds in energy, water, waste and IEQ; a new Location and Transportation credit; and a requirement for environmental product declarations and material ingredient reporting. Green Globes released its new NC (New Construction) update earlier this year in both Canada and the USA, which is largely based on the ANSI/GBI Standard 01-2010: “Green Building Assessment Protocol for Commercial Buildings”.

The two systems differ primarily with respect to materials, energy and quality assurance of the building envelope. Both systems recognize environmental product declarations and material ingredient reporting, but in addition, Green Globes also requires Life Cycle Assessment of the building assemblies, which captures the carbon content of the materials.  On the energy front, Green Globes’ energy modelling is reported and scored in terms of carbon, so that for jurisdictions set on putting the building on carbon diet, this is a plus.

LEED deserves credit for pushing the envelope and spear-heading innovation and the launch of new products and materials. However, there have been some concerns that out of the dozens of  innovative green building materials  that are hitting the market, some may not have had the benefit of sufficient testing, possibly leading to building failure or lower than expected performance. This has been known to result in contractual, legal and technical risks sometimes associated with green buildings.  The ANSI-based Green Globes approach avoids this by putting a high emphasis on the quality of building envelope design and construction, with criteria that focus on specific areas related to envelope design and installation best practices.

The updated Canadian Green Globes has also introduced new innovation credits not dissimilar from the Living Building Challenge, which focus on the positive contribution that buildings can make to the environment and the communities where they are constructed. This signals a departure from the status quo in green building industry, which has generally been more focused on reducing the negative impacts of buildings.

Whereas high profile projects may absorb the higher cost of LEED certification, Green Globes may be the preferred option for projects that are primarily interested in cost effectiveness and ease of use. In the final analysis, both products are good because they get more people to do green building. Jerry Yudelson, the new head of the US organisation the GBI which promotes the Green Globes in the USA believes that there is value in both systems, saying, “There is plenty of room in the marketplace for more than just one rating system and competition is healthy.”

 

EPA – POSSIBLE SHILL GROUP VS. LEED CERTIFICATION?

This time around, below, we are reprinting an article courtesy of China-based Bisagni Environmental Enterprise (BEE), dealing with the subject of whether LEED leads to better energy performance.

We find BEE’s article about the findings from an organization calling itself Environmental Policy Alliance (EPA) to be very intriguing.  The tagline for the EPA website? LEED Exposed.

The organization claims to reveal the truth about LEED – the building performance rating system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council – as something that is “wasting taxpayer money to fund not-so-green buildings.”

Coincidentally, the Ohio state senate recently passed a resolution that would ban state agencies and entities from using LEED v.4 as a building performance rating system. Critics of the bill say that it serves special interests, specifically plastics and chemical companies

Who to believe? What’s your opinion? Please e-mail your comments to publisher@gbplusamag.com and we’ll publish them in our next issue.

Energy Savings in Buildings with LEED Certification

The free-market group Environmental Policy Alliance (EPA) released some very unsettling findings regarding LEED: that the supposedly green buildings with LEED certification in Washington D.C. actually use more energy than those buildings that aren’t LEED-certified at all.

Does LEED really lead to better energy performance?

According to the group, even the Washington headquarters of the USGBC, with its platinum LEED certification, scores 236 EUI (energy use intensity), compared to the average 199 EUI for non-LEED certified buildings in the capital.  A difference of 37 EUI isn’t so big, but every watt counts when one is aiming for energy efficiency.

If you ask physics professor John Scofield who runs ThePragmaticSteward blog though, analysis of energy use between one group of building and another is hard to do correctly and objectively, especially if the measurers are people “who begin the study with a stake in the outcome—either those promoting LEED or those ‘dug against it’.”

Possible Shill Group vs. LEED Certification

Which leads us to ask what the Environmental Policy Alliance has at stake in their report.

We checked out their website, which looks pretty legit, but their LEED Exposed section is somewhat suspect—the page branches out into “evidence“ links as to why LEED is a waste of tax-payers money.  A quick read of the articles inside points out the various criticisms that have been hurled at LEED time and again.  LEED isn’t open for commenting from the general public, the science behind LEED is questionable, LEED .favors only one timber source, among other things.  Some of the concerns might be valid, some obviously made out of spite.

When a website however devotes all its energy to discredit LEED without so much as giving the other side of the story—what makes LEED effective, for instance—all their efforts appear tainted with a dark cloud of hatred and malice.

Questioning LEED Certification

Shill group or not, Environmental Policy Alliance raises a few valid issues about LEED’s shortcoming as a green building certification that’s worth discussing.

In particular, LEED’s weighted point-based system makes it easy for builders to pick and choose the easiest and most feasible points first, thereby securing for the project a respectable score.  No doubt, this bonus point-hunting dilutes green building’s honest intentions, burying it in a flurry of metrics and technical specs.  The builder gets busy on metrics, instead of ascertaining if those metrics actually translate into good building’s performance in real life

As an example, the Living Building Challenge—an alternative to LEED, requires a full year of operation before verifying its energy and water performance, which is a pretty straightforward and sensible approach.  In fairness to LEED 2009, its Minimum Program Requirement (MPR #6) gives owners the option to commit to sharing whole-building energy and water consumption data for up to five years beginning occupancy, although that too is a bit lax.  Since it is just an option, owners can opt out if installing such meters is cost-prohibitive or impractical to install.

MPR 6 Option 2 invites projects to demonstrate their commitment to high performance operations by pursuing LEED for Existing Buildings: O&M certification within two (2) years of accepting their design and construction certification. Although projects pursuing LEED EB: O&M are not required to complete the 5-year reporting period before achieving existing building certification, they will have to re-commit to MPR 6 for another 5 year period (or until their LEED EB:O&M recertification) when registering for LEED EB: O&M. (Bold letters ours.)

Even the USGBC itself is accused of cherry-picking LEED energy data, since it only provides information for 450 out of the 1,861 buildings it has gathered data from.  That only amounts to 24%, hardly reliable to get any definitive answer about the performance of buildings with LEED certification.

We honestly want the best out of LEED and we’re glad LEED v4 is currently addressing that laxness in 2009.  Because if it doesn’t, LEED risks becoming just a glorified brand, something builders use to attach to their project to garner prestige.  LEED has to be more than just beautiful in theory and on paper.

 

Tower of Power

Dutch architects hold out hope that skyscraper project utilizing wind power will come to fruition

With an eye trained directly on a sustainable future, Amsterdam-based NL Architects has come up with plans for an energy-generating skyscraper that would harness the power of 600 wind turbines.

The project first came to light recently when NL Architects entered the concept – dubbed Tower of Power – in the Taiwan Conceptual Tower International Competition. While its bid did not win, a spokesperson for NL Architects says that there is definite interest in this innovative idea, and they are confident an energy company will help see it through to fruition.

The project would utilize 600 wind turbines to produce six megawatts of electricity. In addition to its renewable energy-generating capabilities, NL’s spokesperson said the landmark tower would provide an observation deck, meeting space, office space, museum, and parking.  The lace-like skyscraper, then, would combine mixed-use space with a productive clean energy source for a city.

“The idea,” the NL spokesperson tells Green Building and Sustainable Strategies magazine,“ is to combine a type of observation tower with wind energy generation, creating a new type of sustainable landmark.  To get that, we would deploy vertical access wind turbines and place them in the intricate ‘lace’ of the structure. Think Eiffel Tower plus wind energy equals landmark of the future.”

accion-5

 

Inspiration for the Tower of Power design came from a “bamboo basket” concept. There would be a meshed exterior encasing all the of building’s elements. The way the design of the structure weaves in and out would create an intricate pattern and series of spaces that would offer city views. The mesh-like tower would have small vertical axis turbines installed into the façade, all of which would produce the projected amount of clean energy power.

The gaps between the mesh would provide the space needed for the installation of the 600 wind turbines. The turbines, says NL Architects, would be quiet and sculptural, as opposed to larger, noisier alternatives.

In its brief to the Taiwan competition, NL stated: “Tower of Power is not just a symbol of good intentions; it actually produces green energy. Instead of being yet another ‘empty’ icon, it actually is a usable object.

accion-2

“Next to its required functionality as sightseeing tower and telecommunication base, it is an environmentally-friendly power plant.  And Tower of Power is also an attempt to investigate how power plants of the future can be turned into objects of beauty.”

Web: www.nlarchitects.nl/

WORLD GREEN CENTER

Sustainable shakeup

The World Green Center in Chile improves quality of life for workers and provides business district makeover
By GREG McMILLAN

Decisions, decisions, decisions – cCe Architects of Santiago, Chile, had one after another to make when they were planning the LEED-pending World Green Center.

“But every decision we made in the project,” says Cristobal Correa Ehlers, Partner and Founder of cCe, “aimed to improve the quality of life of the people who work there.”

Those sustainable goals – a human impact, if you will – were first and foremost, and the results can be seen everywhere at the building, located in the business district of Huechuraba in Santiago, the capital city of the South American country.

CIUDAD EMPRESARIAL_Conjunto_VISTA 2

Let’s start at the beginning. Besides its location, architects looked at the site’s relation to the city, connecting roads, sunlight, prevailing winds, people flow, existing infrastructure, green spaces and public areas. Then consideration was given to occupation strategy, the difference in levels on the building, the inclined façades and the roof slope – in a nutshell: the overall design.

Oficina terraza directa

With an expansive, landscaped roof and more than 72 per cent of the ground surface “green,” the World Green Center also has a passive design that reduces solar radiation and substantially cuts back the energy used for air conditioning. The green roof, by the way, is covered with terraces and gardens that also serve as a buffer for the tropical heat.

With any extra space found, the architects incorporated public areas, or an infrastructure that connects commuters and draws them toward such features as convention centres, art galleries, or theatres.  All in all, the development creates a link with the street and the rest of the city’s business district.

Correa Ehlers is proud of the human impact and sustainable features, saying “we intend for this office building to become a reference for a new way to design buildings in Chile.”

Sustainable features, he tells Green Building and Sustainable Strategies magazine, include natural cross ventilation in 100 per cent of the offices, natural light in 100 per cent of the vertical cores and lobbies, natural light in 100 per cent of the office spaces and collection and reuse of air conditioning waste water and graywater.

CIUDAD EMPRESARIAL_Conjunto_Vista 3

He says human impact considerations include:

  • Green roof terraces: Nine hundred people from top-floor offices have a direct relationship with nature. “That relationship with nature increases mind health of every worker and helps in having a healthy work environment.”
  • Public green park covering 70 per cent of the site: “For the people who don’t have green in their immediate office area, there is a public park at the street level, allowing everyone access to green space.”
  • Natural light in 100 per cent of the office spaces: “To work with natural light, instead of artificial, increases the quality of life at work, leading to a better working performance.” (Artificial light is used only by night.)

CIUDAD EMPRESARIAL_Conjunto_Vista 01

“This type of building not only takes energy efficiency into consideration,” Correa Ehlers adds, “but it also embodies the final user experience, providing quality public spaces and interior areas with the best environmental conditions.  Those elements, combined, make this a truly sustainable building.”

Web: www.ccearquitectos.com/

superkul

CANADA’S FIRST ACTIVE HOUSE

Toronto based architects superkül designed Canada’s first Active House in Ontario’s Niagara region. Great
Gulf, one of Canada’s largest home builders, selected superkül, a firm with a breadth of experience designing
sustainable homes, to design Canada’s first residence that meets the construction metrics outlined by
the Danish Active House program. The Active House program was initiated by a European consortium of
academics, scientists, architects, engineers, and building manufacturers to promote a holistic approach to
home design that marries environmental responsibility and energy efficiency with the need to design spaces
that contribute positively to the health and well being of its residents.
“We’ve designed several green homes, but this project presented the exciting opportunity to collaborate
with Great Gulf and the Active House Alliance to create a new paradigm for the sustainably-minded and
health-conscious homebuyer,” said Andre D’Elia, a Principal at superkül and the lead architect for Great Gulf
Active House.


superkül’s design strategy considered the environmental impact of the entire lifecycle of the home from
concept to performance as well as its impact on its users. The house is oriented with the long roof slope and
major glazing facing south to maximize the efficiency of the solar hot-water system and passive solar gain.
The multitude of skylights and windows create naturally light-filled spaces and minimize the need for artificial
light. Two intersecting axes guide the open plan of the interior to maximize cross breezes. By removing visual
barriers between living spaces, the open plan also creates the impression of a larger home. To promote the
comfort of the residents, superkül ensured that each room featured exterior views without compromising
privacy. The patio that aligns with the width of the living room reinforces the visually seamless extension of the
interior spaces.


Great Gulf Active House boasts fully integrated systems designed to optimize natural lighting and air quality
while reducing its dependency on non-renewable energy sources. Natural ventilation is encouraged by a
dual-zone HVAC system connected to a Somfy Tahoma Smart House system that uses sensors to automate
the windows, blinds and 14 skylights to open and close in response to the interior temperature and air quality
while two heat recovery ventilation (HRV ) units supply the house with fresh air. The use of low VOC paints
and low emitting interior finishes improve indoor air quality. A grey water heat recovery unit captures heat from
showers and baths and preheats incoming cold water to reduce the energy demand for domestic hot water.
A cistern and rainwater collection system reduces the need for municipal water up to an estimated 35% while
lessening the loads on the municipal waste water system. superkül ensured the house is supplied by 100%
renewable energy by installing solar thermal panels and providing renewable gas from Bullfrog Power. The
electricity, also provided by Bullfrog Power, comes from 100% renewable sources.
The exterior walls, roof and floor systems were prefabricated in Toronto at Brockport Home Systems’ factory,
expediting the house to be erected in only one week. This innovative construction method not only reduces
material waste, energy usage, and risks of onsite accidents during the construction process but also improves
the accuracy and quality of construction. The wood frame panels are a more sustainable alternative to the
typical steel structure.


Great Gulf Active House will be studied and measured by architects, product manufacturer and construction
teams to define the next generation of Great Gulf homes.

AMPHIBIOUS HABITAT

Back to nature

Thai project Amphibious Habitat borrows from existing ecological systems to tackle delta flooding problems

Right now, it’s in the experimental design stage, but an ambitious concept put forth by Bangkok’s MAB Studio takes aim at the flooding problem in Thailand in a back-to-the-future way.

It could be called Sustainable Living 101. As it stands, though, the apt name for the project is Amphibious Habitat; and it has lofty goals – patterning residential buildings after the complex natural workings of coastal mangrove forests.

As MAB’s Achawin Laohavichairat explains to Green Living and Sustainable Strategies magazine, Thailand’s history has much in common with water communities such as Venice, Italy.
“Our climate and our typography teaches us to live with water,” he says. “Whether it is a Thai house, a floating market, transportation by water – it’s part of our past.”

Perspective 01

Laohavichairat believes Thailand has gotten away from its sustainable watery roots – citing the unstable delta flood tide situations and coastal erosion originating from industrial destruction – and the Amphibious Habitat idea offers a way out of the current dilemma.

“This concept is just an idea to create space that supports living with water,” he says. “If we can’t survive with water like our ancestors did, then we should look at nature and perhaps we can learn how to do that.”

By studying the mangroves, MAB found that the trees were able to adapt to surrounding environment and weather changes. One example: mangrove roots protect small fish when water levels change.

Perspective 04

“We tried to design buildings that can exist within such a changing environment, when water moves up and down (such as flooding conditions),” Laohavichairat says. He also says MAB looked at biological mimicry, how people living in this type of residential project could draw inspiration from the natural ebb and flow.

In a perfect world, the Amphibious Habitat design would become part of a new community, the architect says, that could adapt and support an unstable delta by utilizing the natural ecological system. “The architecture would adjust to the changing environment and would provide infrastructure, urban facilities, energy management and living space to encourage the life process.”

For now, the MAB team is buoyed by the selection of the concept for the finals of a Thai design competition – the ASA (Association of Siamese Architects) Exposition in 2012.

Perspective 05
As for future aspirations?  “As a society, we don’t need to escape from these kinds of [survival] problems, we need to face them and learn how to live with nature.”

Web: http://mabstudiodesign.wordpress.com/

TORONTO 2030 DISTRICT

Is Toronto Ready for a 2030 District?

Jeff Ranson – Executive Director, Toronto 2030 District

Continent-wide, an ambitious urban building conservation initiative is seeks to address the environmental impacts of buildings. “2030 Districts” have been established in Seattle, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Los Angeles, with over twenty other cities in the exploratory phase. Here in Toronto, a team lead by BOMA Toronto, the Ontario Association of Architects and Sustainable Buildings Canada expects to launch the Toronto 2030 District in December 2013. The Toronto 2030 District aims to leverage local programs, district-wide benchmarking and economies of scale to accelerate the pace of innovation in building performance.

First established in Seattle, 2030 Districts are in the leading edge of the national effort to create long-term partnerships, coalitions, and collaboration around achievable and measurable conservation goals. The provides a framework for mobilizing the renovation of hundreds of millions of square feet of existing urban and suburban buildings and infrastructure, the advancement of high performance building management practices, and adoption of new green building design. 2030 Districts are unique private/public partnerships that bring property owners and managers together with local governments, businesses, and community stakeholders to provide a business model for urban sustainability through collaboration, leveraged financing, and shared resources. Together they benchmark, develop and implement creative strategies, best practices and verification methods for measuring progress towards a common goal for the building sector.

The basis for this program is laid out by Architecture 2030 in the 2030 Challenge for Planning. The targets are ambitious, but recent changes to Energy Requirements in the Ontario Building Code, a highly skilled professional class, and huge increase in building management improvements in the commercial sector goes a long way to getting us there. By focusing on these targets within a specified “District” the program benefits from shared resources, and common issues, local design and approaches and services, as well as community cohesiveness to mobilize change.

2030 District Goals:

NEW BUILDINGS, MAJOR RENOVATIONS, AND NEW INFRASTRUCTURE:

Targets-New Construction

  • Energy Use: an immediate 60% reduction below the National average, with incremental targets, reaching carbon neutral by 2030.
  • Water Use: An immediate 50% reduction below the current District average.
  • CO2e of Auto and Freight: An immediate 50% reduction below the current District average.

EXISTING BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATIONS:

Targets - Existing Buildings

  • Energy Use: A minimum 10% reduction below the National average by 2015 with incremental targets, reaching a 50% reduction by 2030.
  • Water Use: A minimum 10% reduction below the District average by 2015, with incremental targets, reaching a 50% reduction by 2030.
  • CO2e of Auto and Freight: A minimum 10% reduction below the current District average by 2015 with incremental targets, reaching a 50% reduction by 2030.

 

The proposed Toronto 2030 District would make it the largest area to date, with boundaries from Bathurst st. to the Don Valley, and Dupont to Lake Ontario. The market here will make it unique in several other ways. First and foremost, the pace of construction in the downtown area is far greater than what other Districts are seeing as they recover from the slowdown in 2008. Secondly, the commercial sector is very active through programs like BOMA BESt, Race to Reduce and LEED EB: O&M. Whereas other cities have experienced reluctance from local chapters of BOMA, the leadership and momentum established here in Toronto makes them an important and willing partner.

Alongside BOMA, the OAA, who is developing a OAA+2030 Professional Education Series focused on capacity building in the design community and SBC, which has an extensive history of delivering building design and conservation programs alongside utilities such as Enbridge, comprise the founding members. The partners plan to expand on local successes, drive participation in conservation programs and engage building market segments that have been traditionally less active or well served.

One of the most critical activities will be to serve the local conservation market. Toronto has a number of utility programs, NGOs and government agencies working on common issues related to urban sustainability, but coordination between those groups is largely ad hoc. The 2030 District provides an opportunity to convene different groups and market sectors that share the downtown area to discuss opportunities for reaching district-wide targets. That may means making people aware of an existing program and directing more projects their way, or maybe its transferring knowledge from one market segment to another (i.e. BOMA’s commercial building success to condominium managers).

The backbone of the 2030 District is building performance data. The collection of this district-wide data will let building owners benchmark their performance at the local level instead of using National data limited to their own portfolio, or proxy US National data through the EPA’s Target Finder. In addition, this data will help to quantify sector specific impacts and opportunities like never before. Best of all, the work being done to set the baselines for building types and protocols for data collection in Canada will establish a framework through which other Canadian Cities can follow suit.

2030 represents sixteen years or roughly three generations of construction. It also represents a common deadline for greenhouse gas emissions reductions, set by groups around the world. Significant change is needed and possible in that timeframe and a 2030 District can provide the focus and support to get us there.

The 2030 District approach is so strong and unique because it brings people together under a common set of goals, namely, meeting the 2030 Challenge for Planning, issued by Architecture 2030 in 2007. These cities have committed to reducing energy and water consumption as well as GHG emissions from transportation in almost 80 million square feet of building space.- Ed Mazria, Founder, Architecture 2030